A few months after taking over in my new post as Vice President of the South Asia region, I spent a few days and nights with Bhavnaben and her young family of salt workers on the edge of the desert in the Little Rann of Kutch in Gujarat, India. Since that time, Bhavnaben has become my touchstone of progress in India’s booming economy, and I return every year to visit them. I go to see first hand the life of India’s poorest citizens, to learn about their hopes and dreams, and to trace the small changes in their lives amidst India’s rising prosperity.
In the four years that I’ve known the family, they have made many efforts to improve their circumstances. When I first met them in 2003, they farmed just one salt pan, barely enough to sustain their family of seven - two sons and three daughters. By the time I returned a year later, they had taken on another pan. They were now producing twice the quantity of salt, and that too of better quality. They should be much better off now, I thought.
But escaping the clutches of poverty is never easy. Little did I realize how vulnerable the poor are to exploitation. Now that the family farmed two pans, the water vendor had doubled his charges! As the sole seller of a vital commodity -albeit of dubious quality - he charged whatever he pleased, in this case based on the number of salt pans they owned, instead of the amount of water they bought! Frustrated that others were benefiting from his hard labor, Mangabhai, Bhavanben’s husband, said he didn’t see any incentive to expand his salt business further.
The cost of diesel - their major expense - had also gone up, while the price of salt had remained the same. In Ahmedabad, the state’s major city, I had heard talk about introducing solar or wind power on the salt flats since both have good potential in the desert. But, I saw no evidence of anything being installed so far.
One encouraging sign was that the family had begun to diversify their sources of income to reduce their dependence on their backbreaking ancestral occupation. They had set up a small shop selling basic supplies to others on the pans. The shop - looked after by the oldest son - also sold flour which they now ground themselves using a new machine. In addition, they had begun to produce industrial salt which fetched a much higher price than the consumption salt they produced earlier. And, the four older children – none of whom went to school when I first met them – were now in school. They had learnt to read the vernacular alphabet and rattled off the names of plants and animals pinned up along the walls of the makeshift tent that served as their classroom. Things were looking up, I thought.
On my third and most recent visit in October 2007, the family had diversified further. They had leased a small piece of land to farm for five years. On this, they had grown the staple food of millet and lentils. This was a wise move as it would reduce their expenses on food and ensure that the family’s granary was full for the coming year.
But, there are many pitfalls in the climb out of poverty. Fourteen year old Chandrika, the eldest daughter, had been pulled out of school so that Bhavnaben could spend more time at work alongside her husband. And the eldest son was needed to man the shop. Although the three younger children were still in school, how much they were actually learning was another question. I strongly suspected that Kumar, the second son, was being taken out to work on the salt pans. All parents dream of giving their children a better future. But poor families’ inability to cope without their children’s labor invariably compromises the one thing that can make a real difference - education. The question continues to nag me: Will Bhavnaben’s children ever be able to avail of the new opportunities provided by India’s booming economy?
Health services also remain a huge problem, causing many poor people to slip back into poverty despite their best efforts. An illness means the loss of precious work days, and a consequent set-back in income. Medical care is not easy to come by, local doctors are not particularly qualified, and it is both expensive and time-consuming to go to the bigger towns for attention.
What, then, can their future hold? When I tried to talk to Mangabhai about his financial planning for the time he can no longer work, he looked at me with glazed eyes. He had absolutely no idea. “The poor don’t have the luxury of looking into the future,” Bhavnaben said to me.
Standing next to Bhavnaben I feel small - her ability to cope under extreme conditions is remarkable. Some of us with far more resources and privileges would not be able to survive the way she does – shouldering equal responsibility alongside her husband in the backbreaking work of the salt farm and still managing to look after every little need of the family with good cheer.
There is also an enormous dignity, both within the family and the community. They display great respect for each other and share what little they have with a disarming openness. Yet, they are subjected to a lot of indignity, mostly by outsiders who look down upon them and treat them as fodder for exploitation.
All in all, I came away feeling that although things were looking better, life was still very tough for Bhavnaben and her family, and progress on the ground was painfully slow. Yet, I am optimistic. Given the right kind of support in terms of health, education, and training for a life outside the grueling salt pans, families like Bhavnaben’s can indeed escape the only life they have ever known - a life of constant deprivation and untold poverty.
(Visits to the villages were organized in collaboration with the Self Employed Women's Association (SEWA)).

Mariam Claeson

Mon, 12/03/2007 - 11:14
"Some of us with far more resources and privileges would not be able to survive the way she does – shouldering equal responsibility alongside her husband in the backbreaking work of the salt farm and still managing to look after every little need of the family with good cheer."
I hope I'm not stepping out of bounds here, but I'm not sure I agree with this. I don't deny that poverty--especially chronic, persistent, grinding, severe poverty--is an enormous challenge to cope with. Anyone who is abruptly tumbled into such circumstances would probably be overwhelmed by them, at least initially. Including me (speaking as someone who has been "privileged" enough, and fortunate enough, to have escaped such circumstances up until now). And even someone who has lived in such circumstances, I imagine, must feel overwhelmed from time to time. But to assume that this state would continue indefinitely I think to some extent underestimates human resilency: although poverty never gets easy, I suspect much of what seems "impossible" to endure for those of us who are outsiders to the experience of poverty seem impossible mostly because we have not yet learned the techniques that poor people use to cope with these circumstances.
I guess I tend to be sensitive to assumptions that a certain way of living is necessarily "impossible" for others because non-disabled people often use similar language when talking about disabled people. And these assumptions are also very much mistaken: people with disabilities do, in fact, adapt to circumstances that others view as necessarily being unendurable. Even many people who adamantly believe that "they could never live like that" eventually learn to adapt after they do in fact acquire an impairment or disability--albeit years later than someone who enters life with a disability without the same set of assumptions. They learn technologies and other accommodations that allow them to continue on doing many of the activities they did before their disability and find other enjoyable activities to substitute for the few activities that they truly do need to give up (often a much shorter list than many people assume--at least if you're a middle class person in a rich country).
I raise this point because I'm not sure what purpose it serves to claim other people's lives as being necessarily "impossible" simply because our own imaginations are sufficiently limited that we cannot imagine ourselves in those circumstances. When it's done to people with disabilities, that kind of thinking can sometimes serve to dehumanize us (because if we do, in fact, endure those circumstances with "good cheer" then we must be somehow superhuman, which can progress surprisingly easily into meaning not human at all). These assumptions can even put our lives at risk: there are cases where a person with a disability will go into hospital for some minor surgery and encounter doctors who simply assume they would not want to be resuscitated if something went wrong because "who would want to live like that?" (And this is in rich countries, where we have far more technology and wheelchair ramps and captioned television etc than in developing countries. See "Not Dead Yet" for specifics.)
I don't know if the same assumptions would lead to similar effects for poor people -- I hope not. I don't even know if poor people are bothered by these types of assumptions or not (unfortunately having lacked sufficient contact with poor people myself; a deficiency in my background that I'd welcome the opportunity to correct). But the parallels compelled me to at least raise the question.
Andrea Shettle, MSW
http://wecando.wordpress.com (Blogging Disability and International Development)
Tue, 11/27/2007 - 23:12
A typical family who lives on less than a dollar a day in South Asia. I have seen (and lived) in this situation for years. I was wondering what good has years of aid and development help have done to improve the lives of people like Bhavanben? Still, the opportunity cost of sending children to school is too high (in terms of work in farms) and the ugly tradeoff between education in school and work on farm exists in our region. Health services have not reached the poorest, despite increase in the number of doctors and MBBS graduates. Access to drinking water is still a distant dream even in places containing abundant natural springs! At times, things look more dismal and miserable than it was in the past.
Honestly, I read so many development theories (which fascinate me while going over them and while solving problems specifically tailored to suit the theories and assumptions) but feel dejected when I read about static living standard of people. It is really unpleasant to read news about families who have to spend more than two hours to fetch/steal water, that too from another village, where people are not friendly. Worse, it feels bad to read news about the sorry state of education, the very foundation to increase the stock of knowledge and spur sustained economic growth, in our region. Due to unavailability of space, infrastructure, and other necessities, students from two different classes are crammed into a same room, and with a single teacher to look after the two classes, which go through two different courses at the same time. How real are the prescriptions of the dismal science in solving our miseries?
This forces me to think: are our prescriptions about solving poverty (that too in a generation) realistic or is it just a populist and experimental stint? I am not undermining the rationale and foundations of the prescriptions but what I don’t comprehend is why our efforts are not bringing any change in the lives of Bhavanbens?
A simple teaser: why do donors have to always eye on funding big projects (though the goal of solving poverty is always mentioned in the background), whose completion takes more than a half a decade or so? Why can’t donors simply fund a local initiative that aims to source in water from natural springs? This requires just laying pipes from a natural source to households. And this directly impacts people living in poverty by supplying them with drinking water (forget about clean or not at this time), irrigation to small vegetable farm, good sanitation (means improvement in health condition), among others. Meanwhile, big projects require big money, big commission, big promises that are hardly fulfilled by the political leaders, big conditions, and so on! This is a simple ‘water paradox’ I have not been able to understand despite going over elegant theories and donor promises! A simple problem must have a simple answer that does not require complex arithmetic.
Tue, 11/27/2007 - 19:22 Your report is so revealing. Thanks for providing it. But what is the World Bank doing to help the Bhavnaben family to diversify beyond their salt pans? Clearly, this family is resourceful, but, given the circumstances you report (like the water vendor who takes advantage of them), what can they do without outside help? You say "I am optimistic." But on what basis? It doesn't seems the Bhavnabens are optimistic. Everything wrong that happens to the family, including discrimination against girls, the Bank says it's against. But what, precisely, is it doing in the case of this family whose poverty appears to be imposed by external circumstances? I hope the Bank can do something for them besides being optimistic.