As world leaders meet this week in New York and Washington to discuss climate change and ways to mitigate its effects, the discussion frequently turns to the large, fast-growing economies such as China and India who are, and are likely to be, among the largest emitters of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases. But despite being the world's second most populous country and fourth largest economy, India's CO2 emissions is still only one-fifth that of the U.S. or China. Furthermore, India is one of the lowest-intensity producers of CO2 among the large countries. India's per-capita emissions of CO2 is about one metric ton per person, compared with 4 as the world average, 9 for the United Kingdom and 20 for the U.S.. In a group of 70 of the world's largest emitters, India ranks in the bottom 10. In terms of carbon emissions per unit of GDP (measured at Purchasing Power Parity, or PPP), too, India is virtually the lowest among comparator countries (see chart). Finally, unlike in other countries, India's carbon intensity did not rise as economic growth accelerated in the last decade.
The reasons for India's low carbon intensity have much to do with the low access to electricity. Four hundred million Indians lack access to electricity (as opposed to 100 million Africans), 600 million cook with biomass, and rural electrification rates in the most populous states such as Bihar (10 percent) and Uttar Pradesh (18 percent) are considerably below the African average (21 percent). This means that any effort to slow the growth of CO2 emissions in India will have to be matched by a strategy of giving poor people greater access to electricity. India’s own energy strategy articulated in the Integrated Energy Policy report (2006) and 11th Plan seeks to do this byaugmenting clean and efficient supply of energy, increasing end-use energy efficiency, deepening sectoral reforms and protecting the environment. In short, India has a real chance to set an inspiring example of rapid “climate-responsible” growth.


Mariam Claeson

Tue, 10/02/2007 - 10:05
Yes i do agree with the views of Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,
Y not INDIA (atleast the major cities) start reducing the co2 emissions, we just do hear or see about the pilot projects but where are the actuall NUMBER of projects where each and every individual can see about the ways of reducing the co2 emissions for example,
I am from Mumbai and Mumbai generates 8500 tons of solid waste every day (mixed waste) out of which almost 3500-4000 tons of waste is bio-degradable (approx 400o tons PER DAY) and you can imagine the emissions of methane out of this huge waste everyday, and its quite clear that methane is a green house gas and its 21 times more dangerous than carbon dioxide so y not stop that atleast why MUMBAI needs to apply somewhere else to set up treatment plants if not that WHY this is not happening, infact local municipal corporations should be made COMPULSION to reduce their waste thru treatment and not thru dumping it up at the dumping grounds under the name of SCIENTIFIC DUMPING GROUNDS, why not world bank of south asia makes it comulsion for major cities of INDIA so that atleast something can be visible and it will show how serious we are in reducing co2 emissions, so lets start and develop ways of reducing co2 emissions.
with warm regards
Srinivas Kasulla
MUMBAI
Tue, 10/02/2007 - 10:04
Yes i do agree with the views of Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta,
Y not INDIA (atleast the major cities) start reducing the co2 emissions, we just do hear or see about the pilot projects but where are the actuall NUMBER of projects where each and every individual can see about the ways of reducing the co2 emissions for example,
I am from Mumbai and Mumbai generates 8500 tons of solid waste every day (mixed waste) out of which almost 3500-4000 tons of waste is bio-degradable (approx 400o tons PER DAY) and you can imagine the emissions of methane out of this huge waste everyday, and its quite clear that methane is a green house gas and its 21 times more dangerous than carbon dioxide so y not stop that atleast why MUMBAI needs to apply somewhere else to set up treatment plants if not that WHY this is not happening, infact local municipal corporations should be made COMPULSION to reduce their waste thru treatment and not thru dumping it up at the dumping grounds under the name of SCIENTIFIC DUMPING GROUNDS, why not world bank of south asia makes it comulsion for major cities of INDIA so that atleast something can be visible and it will show how serious we are in reducing co2 emissions, so lets start and develop ways of reducing co2 emissions.
with warm regards
Srinivas Kasulla
MUMBAI
Tue, 10/02/2007 - 06:38
The fact is that India has maximum number of CDM Projects, however the CERs, i.e certified emission reductions out of these projects comes to the second place. It indicates that the CDM projects approved by the DNA as well as verified by the DOEs operating in India, should give importance to the capacity building measures for development of the CDM Projects at the grass root level, as per the approved methodologies of CDM-UNFCCC gidelines. Also, in oeder to take up the capacity building measures a step to involve an Indian DOE, which will understand the methodologies in a better way is required. It is for the Annex A countries that a cab, in GHG emissions has been approaching and they are more seriously trying to be implement the mechanism, i.e CDM/JI. The funding institutions can be a facililator for the capacity building of these mechanisms which are more relevant for India. There could be a opposition by not continuing India, particularly for small scale energy efficiency projects, in the approved methodologies, however the DNA may insist uponits stand with all the back up data as presented by Mr Shanta.
Tue, 10/02/2007 - 00:32
yes i agree with the fact that india is still under the poverty era and still so many indian villages dont have the access to electricity. in some villages wires have reached but still current does not flow. its an alarming situation where the government is not able to manage the transmission of electricity in villages. the reason behind is that any government which starts this project does so but bills are not charged or even if they are charged it is very less thenultimately it becomes arecurring burden on the power supplying agency. but how long this thing can continue. after all some where the losses have be mended. infact in thse issues the govt must think of inviting private parties because it is a business in which we can not continue to accrue losses. yes but in india government is promoting solar energy and equipments are being sold at subsidised rate by the govt agencies which is aboon .
lets hope that india will flourish in the coming years .
rakesh ranjan tiwari
jamshedpur india
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 18:50 While it is satisfying to know that we emit much less co2,with the increasing prosperity in rural areas the demand and need for electricity will go up;since rural areas are dispersed over seven lac villages,centralised prouction and distribution will be expensive and unreliable;with abundant sunlight,solar power is the most appropriate answer.To begin with flashlight or torchlight like the bogo light[www.bogolight.com]which is a solar powered and LED bulb fitted ;it is a good and immidiate option;this light claims adequate bright light to attend to household chores like cooking at night,and more importantly reading and study at night;six hours of exposure to sun will give six hours of lighting at night;it is priced at 25 dollars[Rs.1000] for two units-buyone and giveone - is the business model which will generate unlimited supply;to begin with one can be given to each family that sends its child/children to school; which acts as an incentive to send children to school.Can the world bank consider a project like this ;one on similar lines 'lightup Africa' is being implimented.A similar light called the 'mighty light'is being manufactured in India but priced at Rs.3000.Future of ecofriendly lighting in India lies in LED lighting powered by solar energy.This light meets our cultural trait of individualism and freedom.I am posting this comment from India at 5.19 IST and the time display is of USA!
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 15:31 I believe the key to moving further on the development path along with keeping carbon intensity low is, to invest in alternative energy solutions and innovative low emitting technologies that not only avoid green house gas emissions but also offer a variety of co-benefits, e.g. increased energy access, improved sanitation, new employment and education opportunties etc. A variety of solutions that offer a range of benefits will help us think along the lines of choosing the most sustainable options for future.
Sat, 09/29/2007 - 11:46 What is the World Bank doing to help India extend its grid to its powerless hundreds of millions of people, but not becoming a world-class hydrocarbon emitter.
Mon, 10/15/2007 - 23:26
I come from small town of India. I believe this can be achieved by involving and educating people of India about the benefits (personal) of biogas, solar system and providing them those facilities in cheaper prices. One has to remember that it is a need for them not the topic of science. Best thing to do is educate their community leaders (not political) as well as centralising the system with in the small village.
I believe that India has enough solar power to produce electricity for street lights and day to day electricity needs. People in village uses 10 times less electricity compared to city like Mumbai/Delhi. Yes, solar systems are expensive but cheaper systems are being invented (SUNTECH Power in China, University of NSW, Australia) .
Village of India produces large amount of biomaterial to produce biogas. There is no efforts made to develope centralise system for small village. If this system collect biomaterials from particular village, I believe it will produce enough biogas to provide them gas or electricity. This will also create jobs with in small village. It requires lots of effort. However, Indian learn from the experience of their neighbours. These systems will be marketed by the people of India.